Connection check
verified live · 26h ago
ckg-nvidia-nemoclaw
NVIDIA NemoClaw knowledge graph — 55 nodes, F1 0.576 (+269% vs RAG), 11x fewer tokens. MCP-native.
Tools
8
GitHub stars
—
Installs / wk
—
Licence
—
Transport
streamable-http, stdio
Last checked
26h ago
Tools & capabilities
8 toolsRead from the running server on 26h ago.
ask_nemoclaw
question*
Answer a question about NVIDIA NemoClaw by traversing the knowledge graph. Covers: agent runtimes (OpenClaw/Hermes/Deep Agents), OpenShell platform, inference routing, network pol… Answer a question about NVIDIA NemoClaw by traversing the knowledge graph. Covers: agent runtimes (OpenClaw/Hermes/Deep Agents), OpenShell platform, inference routing, network policy, security layers, deployment paths, progressive tool disclosure, managed MCP servers, snapshots, shields, FOX Blueprint, Nemotron 3 Ultra ecosystem, and platform support. Args: question: Your question about NemoClaw concepts or architecture.
get_prerequisites
concept*
Return the full upstream prerequisite chain for a NemoClaw concept. Useful for understanding what a concept depends on end-to-end. Args: concept: Exact or partial concept lab… Return the full upstream prerequisite chain for a NemoClaw concept. Useful for understanding what a concept depends on end-to-end. Args: concept: Exact or partial concept label.
list_domains
List available domains in this CKG server. List available domains in this CKG server.
query_ckg
depthconcept*
Return the typed subgraph around a NemoClaw concept. Args: concept: Exact or partial concept label (e.g. 'OpenClaw', 'NetworkPolicy', 'L7Proxy'). depth: Traversal hops (1–… Return the typed subgraph around a NemoClaw concept. Args: concept: Exact or partial concept label (e.g. 'OpenClaw', 'NetworkPolicy', 'L7Proxy'). depth: Traversal hops (1–5, default 3).
query_intersect
modedepthlimitbranches*direction
Answer a conjunctive query: concepts reachable from EVERY anchor at once (A AND B). query_ckg walks outward from one concept. This intersects the reachable sets of two or more, wh… Answer a conjunctive query: concepts reachable from EVERY anchor at once (A AND B). query_ckg walks outward from one concept. This intersects the reachable sets of two or more, which is the shape of most real questions — "the component that satisfies A AND applies to B". Neither anchor alone answers it; the answer lives in the overlap. Every branch is an exact set of declared edges, so the intersection is exact. A concept appears only if a declared path reaches it from each anchor. A relation missing from the graph produces an empty result, never a guess. Args: branches: Two or more branches. Either a bare anchor ("TensorRT-LLM"), which takes everything within `depth` hops, or an anchor plus an explicit relation path using '>' ("TensorRT-LLM > REQUIRES > ENABLES"), where each relation replaces the frontier. '*' matches any relation. Mix both forms freely. depth: Hops for bare-anchor branches, 1-5 (default 2). Ignored for explicit paths. direction: 'out' follows dependencies, 'in' follows them backwards, 'both' (default). mode: 'AND' (default) intersects branches; 'OR' unions them. limit: Max concepts listed, 1-200 (default 40). The true count is always shown. Returns: Markdown with the query plan and its per-step set sizes, then the answer set with taxonomy tags. Reports which branch was empty when the intersection is empty.
route_query
question*
Route a NemoClaw question to the optimal model and reasoning approach via graph depth. The CKG graph IS the router. NemoClaw's dependency chains (e.g. OpenShell → L7Proxy → Corpor… Route a NemoClaw question to the optimal model and reasoning approach via graph depth. The CKG graph IS the router. NemoClaw's dependency chains (e.g. OpenShell → L7Proxy → CorporateCA → mTLS) are deep and typed — hop depth is a deterministic complexity signal. No heuristic: the graph decides which model and reasoning approach to use. Routing table: hop_depth 1 → haiku · direct (single concept lookup) hop_depth 2 → sonnet · generic_cot (moderate chain) hop_depth 3+ → opus · sparql_cot (deep chain, structured reasoning required) Args: question: Concept name or natural language question about NemoClaw / OpenShell. Returns: model_tier + reasoning_approach + why + context subgraph to inject before LLM call.
search_concepts
query*
Fuzzy search for NemoClaw concepts by name or keyword. Args: query: Partial name or keyword (e.g. 'policy', 'inference', 'agent'). Fuzzy search for NemoClaw concepts by name or keyword. Args: query: Partial name or keyword (e.g. 'policy', 'inference', 'agent').
verify_source
concept*