Connection check
verified live · 27h ago
zetesis
Scientific due diligence on a claim: reviewer questions, failure patterns, dated evidence.
Tools
4
GitHub stars
—
Installs / wk
—
Licence
—
Transport
streamable-http, stdio
Last checked
27h ago
Tools & capabilities
4 toolsRead from the running server on 27h ago.
evaluate_claim
read-only
as_ofclaim*contextdocuments
REQUIRES A TOKEN. This tool refuses without one. If you do not have a Zetesis token, do not call it: use zetesis_scope then zetesis_evidence instead, which need no token, run no mo… REQUIRES A TOKEN. This tool refuses without one. If you do not have a Zetesis token, do not call it: use zetesis_scope then zetesis_evidence instead, which need no token, run no model, return immediately, and let you read the sources at full depth. A token can be requested at https://api.zetesis.science/request-access. Run Zetesis's own graded reading of a scientific, biomedical, clinical, or AI/ML claim. SLOW: this runs the hosted engine end to end and typically takes a couple of minutes, long enough that some clients background or time out the call. It is not the default route. For almost every case, call zetesis_scope and then zetesis_evidence instead. Those return immediately, run no model, cost nothing, hand you the same dated evidence and the same grading rubric, and let you read the sources at full depth in your own context rather than at abstract level. Reach for this tool only when someone explicitly wants Zetesis's own verdict as the artifact, rather than your analysis of the evidence Zetesis retrieves. It grades each evidence dimension and returns an overall reading with sources cited by hard id (PMID, DOI, NCT, NIH grant, SEC filing). Works for drug, omics, target-validation, diagnostic, and AI-model claims. A signed, independently re-checkable dossier is available by request at the Zetesis site. Args: claim: the claim to evaluate, in one or two sentences. context: optional background (stage, field, the decision at hand). documents: optional source text (a deck, abstract, or paper). as_of: year the claim was made. Set it for any claim that is not brand new. It restricts evidence to what existed then, which both keeps later outcomes out of the reading and sharply improves what is retrieved: left open, a pivotal trial report competes with every paper published since and gets buried.
verify_attestation
read-only
attestation_json*
Verify a Zetesis attestation, confirming an evaluation's claim, evidence, and conclusion have not been altered since it was signed. Use when someone has a Zetesis dossier o… Verify a Zetesis attestation, confirming an evaluation's claim, evidence, and conclusion have not been altered since it was signed. Use when someone has a Zetesis dossier or attestation and wants to independently re-check it. Args: attestation_json: the full attestation object as JSON text.
zetesis_evidence
read-only
as_ofqueries*include_capital
Step 2 of a Zetesis evaluation. Runs the search queries against public evidence sources (Europe PMC, ClinicalTrials.gov, openFDA, and optionally NIH RePORTER and SEC EDGAR)… Step 2 of a Zetesis evaluation. Runs the search queries against public evidence sources (Europe PMC, ClinicalTrials.gov, openFDA, and optionally NIH RePORTER and SEC EDGAR) and returns a deduplicated bundle where every source carries a hard public id, followed by the Zetesis grading rubric so you can grade the dimensions yourself. With as_of set, retrieval is fenced to sources published, registered, or filed on or before 31 December of that year, and two fields that leak later outcomes are suppressed: a trial's present-day status, and FDA labels effective after the cutoff. That makes it possible to judge a claim on what was actually knowable at the time. Runs no model, costs nothing, and returns immediately. Use zetesis_scope first to choose the queries. Together the two make up the preferred route into Zetesis. Args: queries: 3 to 6 short keyword phrases. Query 1 should be the bare name of the thing claimed about (a drug, compound code, model, or gene); query 2 that name plus at most two outcome words. Longer phrases retrieve commentary rather than the primary report. If the claim names no agent at all (a behaviour, diet, procedure, exposure or policy), anchor on the field's own technical term instead of the lay one ("time restricted eating", not "intermittent fasting"), pair it with the outcome as the field measures it, and allow one design word such as crossover or randomized in one later query. Without an entity name that design word is the only thing separating a trial report from a review of trial reports. as_of: optional cutoff year, as used in zetesis_scope. include_capital: also retrieve funding and public-filing signal.
zetesis_scope
read-only
as_ofclaim*contextclaim_class